1/29/2024 0 Comments Six flags fingerprint lawsuit formMe: "Let the court note the BS Director to be showing system functionality indicating my own Biometrics. Witness: "Sure thing, just a give me a second., ah there it is! Ha! I see you visited our facility this morning, hope you had a blast!" If this is so then I wonder if you wouldn't mind pulling up any records from the east gate at precisely 9:00AM this morning, on your BS fingerphone?" You also claimed to link this data to snapshots taken at the same time the scan was performed. Rippoff, in your prior testimony you claimed that you installed numerous BS systems in aid of fingerscanning, which also had the capability of storing hi-res images of the fingerprints themselves if so enabled. Witness: "Rod Rippoff, Director of BS, at the BS Alliance." Me: "Please state your name and occupation for the court, and may I remind you Sir that you are still under oath." Me: "Your Honor, I believe if the court would allow me to." Judge: "IT does NOT please this court, and furthermore YOU do NOT please this court, I'm afraid the Court has not the time nor the patience for another one of your 'fishing' expeditions!" Me: "Rather, if it would please the Court, the defense would like to recall the Director of the Biometric Services Alliance to the stand!" Me: "Does Six Flags capture entire fingerprints in order to create the data points used for identification of your patrons?!" Signmaker: "You are trying to confuse me! I am trying to show you." Signmaker: "You don't understand! We only." So, would you agree that mapping your unique data points requires the patrons to be fingerprinted?" you would have this court believe that even though your system scans the entire fingerprint to capture these 'unique data points', that you don't keep the scanned fingerprint in your database? Signmaker: "YES!" We have to scan the enire fingerprint so we can capture the data points required to identify holders of season passes!" Signmaker: "Finger scans are NOT fingerprints!" Me: "Your honor! Please direct the witness to answer the question!" Me: (cutting signmaker off) "Please answer the question Mr. Signmaker - isn't it true that in order to map these 'unique' data points, that scanning of the entire fingerprint is required?" Though lo-res, it should still be guarded since if this data fell into the wrong hands and they had access to your primary credential, and, most importantly, had a Frankenfinger kit like Brian, they could ride all summer long at six-flags without detection. So I think it would be better, and more accurate to show something like this at the turnstile, which has 20 datapoints, but is still not reversible to the image at far left: And its not the end of the world if it lets a couple of people in that shouldn't get thru. secondary credential, used only for verification of primary, of assumed identity, in a non-critical system, they would only have to store very few (10?) datapoints to effectively tell you from your brother, (when you are trying to use his season's pass). On the other hand, if the 'resolution' of the data points is low enough, no one would really consider it a picture, And given their requirements, i.e. Misleading, since a JPEG=mathmetical representation of scanned data points (numbers)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |